Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. Sellars, October 23, 2007 (Diaz)(unpublished)

Posted on July 20, 2008 by Mack Sperling

The Court denied a motion for expedited discovery, but noted that the discovery at issue had already been served, and stated that "[i]n light of the claims alleged in the Complaint, the Court is not inclined to look favorably upon a motion by Defendant for an extension of time to respond to those requests."

Full Opinion

Brief in Support of Motion for Expedited Discovery

Brief in Opposition to Motion for Expedited Discovery

Tags:
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.ncbusinesslitigationreport.com/admin/trackback/80412
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.