McKinnon v. CV Industries, Inc., April 20, 2009 (Tennille)(unpublished)

The Court had mandatory jurisdiction over Plaintiff's complaint because it involved the interpretation of a shareholders agreement, and also because it involved the rights to manufacture certain products and use certain processes covered by patents.

Full Opinion


Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.

Remember personal info?