McKinnon v. CV Industries, Inc., April 20, 2009 (Tennille)(unpublished)

Posted on August 22, 2009 by Mack Sperling

The Court had mandatory jurisdiction over Plaintiff's complaint because it involved the interpretation of a shareholders agreement, and also because it involved the rights to manufacture certain products and use certain processes covered by patents.

Full Opinion

Complaint

Tags:
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.ncbusinesslitigationreport.com/admin/trackback/152237
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.