The Court found that a Complaint seeking commissions due which would require the interpretation of various infrastructure agreements concerning "the fiber optic infrastructure to support the provision of telecommunication and internet services" fell within its jurisdiction over matters involving "the internet and electronic commerce."
The Court found additional support for the designation in Defendant’s counterclaim for misappropriation of trade secrets, which implicated its jurisdiction over matters involving "state trademark or unfair competition law."
Opposition to Notice of Designation
Memorandum Supporting Retention of Action in Business Court
Notice of Designation and Complaint