The issue was whether plaintiff, which had presented a letter of intent to purchase the a non-party bottling company, had a valid and enforceable agreement. The Court found that the letter of intent was an agreement to agree at a future date which was subject to a future, more complete acquisition agreement, and it therefore
Tortious Interference
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. Head & Enquist Equipment, L.L.C., 2002 NCBC 4 (N.C. Super. Ct. July 10, 2002)(Tennille)
This is a significant Business Court opinion on unfair competition. The defendants were a competitor of the plaintiff, and former employees of the plaintiff who had left to join the defendant. The first issue addressed by the Court was whether the former employees owed a fiduciary duty to their former employer. The Court found there…
Staton v. Brame, 2001 NCBC 5 (N.C. Super. Ct. May 31, 2001)(Tennille)
A myriad of claims were at issue in this case, which involved claims of misuse of funds in trust. Some of plaintiff’s claims were barred by a settlement agreement it had entered into with other entities. Others were dismissed because the court determined that a trustee had repudiated his fiduciary relationship, and could not be…
Praxair, Inc. v. Airgas, 1999 NCBC 9 (N.C. Super. Ct. Oct. 20, 1999)(Tennille)
This case involved the question whether a joint venture agreement, by which the defendant acquired 47% of the stock of a non-party, violated the plaintiff’s right of first refusal under an agreement with the non-party.
The Court held that a restraint on the transfer of ownership must be strictly construed, particularly where the restraint may…
Praxair, Inc. v. Airgas, Inc., 1999 NCBC 5 (N.C. Super. Ct. May 26, 1999)(Tennille)
The claim here involved a Right of First Refusal. Plaintiff alleged that the defendants had engaged in a sham transaction designed to deprive it of its rights under the RFR, by effectively selling a controlling interest in the company in which plaintiff had the RFR through a Joint Venture Agreement.
The defendant sellers had been careful…
Reeve and Assocs., Inc. v. UCB, 1997 NCBC 2 (N.C. Super. Ct. Oct. 6, 1997)(Tennille)
A senior lienholder had no fiduciary duty to a junior lienholder. The mere fact that the senior lienholder took action to cause its debt to be paid down did not establish domination and control of the debtor’s business so as to give rise to a fiduciary duty. The senior lienholder’s efforts to collect its debt…